專欄烏克蘭

Putin’s next move – invade eastern Ukraine?

There could not have been more brutal testimony to the cynicism of Russia’s war in eastern Ukraine than the television mages beamed from the crash site of MH17. Sight of balaclava-wearing paramilitaries barring access to the downed Malaysian aircraft and the charred remains of its passengers and crew must have made even some in the Kremlin blanch.

The accumulating evidence points to a Russian-made ground-to-air missile fired from territory held by Russian separatists. Western intelligence agencies think, but probably will not be able to prove, that the missile battery was under the control of Russian military personnel.

This was not how Moscow had planned things. In the weeks before the downing of MH17 military analysts at NATO had noticed a steady build up of Russian military forces near the Ukrainian border. By the time the aircraft was blown from the sky, senior alliance figures had calculated that Moscow had plans and forces in place to mount a full-scale invasion of the region now held by the separatists. The question was when?

您已閱讀24%(1046字),剩餘76%(3399字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯

菲力普•斯蒂芬斯(Philip Stephens)目前擔任英國《金融時報》的副主編。作爲FT的首席政治評論員,他的專欄每兩週更新一次,評論全球和英國的事務。他著述甚豐,曾經爲英國前首相托尼-布萊爾寫傳記。斯蒂芬斯畢業於牛津大學,目前和家人住在倫敦。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×