觀點香港

Reform in Hong Kong must follow the Basic Law

A Chinese government white paper published last month has set some western media abuzz. The cause, apparently, is its claim that China has full jurisdiction over Hong Kong.

This should not have been a surprise. A careful review of history reveals the correct perspective. More than three decades ago, Margaret Thatcher’s government proposed to concede sovereignty to China in exchange for keeping the territory under British administration. This was flatly rejected by Deng Xiaoping.

China’s sovereignty over Hong Kong is logically embodied in its overall jurisdiction. However, the Chinese government made special arrangements to exercise jurisdiction through the Basic Law. Beijing directly exercises diplomatic and national defence powers; it also appoints Hong Kong’s chief executive and principal officials, and amends and interprets the Basic Law. In turn, the Chinese government authorises a high degree of autonomy to the administration and people of Hong Kong.

您已閱讀23%(967字),剩餘77%(3179字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×