史諾登

Do not blindly trust official guardians of our security
讓媒體擔任監督角色更靠譜


FT專欄作家加普:儘管史諾登和相關記者有種種缺點,但《衛報》對NSA監聽活動的報導是有分寸和負責任的。與政府對情報機構的管控相比,我更相信媒體的監督。

Last month, technicians from GCHQ, the UK electronic surveillance agency, stood over journalists from The Guardian newspaper to make sure that they destroyed a computer containing files leaked to them by Edward Snowden, the former contractor to the US National Security Agency. This week, the British police abused anti-terror legislation to detain David Miranda, the partner of Glenn Greenwald, a Guardian journalist, and seize his files. Coming up next: officials from the NSA and GCHQ bang their heads against a brick wall in frustration at having allowed Mr Snowden to abscond with their secrets. It would be as effective, and legal.

上個月,英國電子偵聽機構——國家通訊總部(GCHQ)的技術人員緊盯著《衛報》(The Guardian)記者,以確保他們破壞了一臺電腦,該電腦上裝有由美國國家安全局(NSA)前合約員工愛德華•史諾登(Edward Snowden)披露給他們的檔案。就在本週,英國警方又借用反恐法律,拘留了《衛報》記者葛倫•葛林沃爾德(Glenn Greenwald)的伴侶戴維•米蘭達(David Miranda),並沒收了他的文檔。接下來的一幕是,NSA和GCHQ官員對於自己竟然讓史諾登帶著大量機密潛逃,氣得用頭撞牆。這麼做的有效性相同,還合法。

您已閱讀12%(903字),剩餘88%(6684字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×