波士頓

Obama must tread a wary path after the Boston attack

In his speech at Boston Cathedral last week, Barack Obama did what a responsible president should do following a terrorist attack: he channelled the public’s reaction. “We do not hunker down,” he said. “We carry on.” It was a carefully judged oration. My colleague Christopher Caldwell even described it as possibly Mr Obama’s “finest hour”. Posterity will be the judge of that. We are still in the early days of the aftermath of Boston.

Tragedies often crystallise a country’s political mood. On the upside, the Massachusetts police’s success in hunting down the culprits within four days was an extraordinary display of single-mindedness. The ending may have looked like overkill: 2,000 police surrounding a bleeding teenager in a boat. But they secured him alive and that will be invaluable. The same praise is owed to Boston’s first responders and to its public who displayed the kind of calm that makes emergencies manageable. It was one of Boston’s finest hours.

On the negative side, the broader response – and that of much of the media – highlighted the US tendency to overreact to terrorism. Since September 11, US leaders have lulled people into a false sense of security. No more attacks on the homeland, they have been promised. On the one occasion that Mr Obama suggested otherwise – “we can absorb another terrorist attack”, he said in 2010 – he was pilloried for sounding fatalistic.

您已閱讀26%(1396字),剩餘74%(3947字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×