觀點會計準則

End the pernicious influence of US accounting rules

In recent days, the Bank of England has called for banks to produce more prudent accounts. It is worried that banks’ failure to recognise likely defaults – associated with so-called zombie companies – is holding back lending, and thus growth. Hewlett-Packard’s decision to write off 80 per cent of the value of its 2011 acquisition of Autonomy, the UK software company, highlights the vital role of robust accounts outside the banking sector. We, along with other investors, believe that prudence needs to be restored to accounting in all companies if we are to have confidence in the numbers and to support sustained economic growth.

As long-term shareholders, we depend on accounts to provide a reliable view of a company’s capital, to evaluate the performance of executives and to give managements incentives to create enduring value. Directors require prudent accounts to fulfil their legal responsibilities: to determine that a company is solvent and how much money can be distributed to shareholders without eating into capital.

To achieve this, accounts must emphasise realisable values and incorporate likely losses. They should provide a “true and fair” view of a business, not exaggerated by shortlived market fluctuations.

您已閱讀26%(1231字),剩餘74%(3442字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×