歐元區

Lex_EU banking union – obvious obstacles
Lex專欄:歐洲銀行業聯盟的障礙


讓歐洲央行成爲歐元區6000家銀行的最終監管者的提案很難實施,這將影響到歐洲穩定機制何時能對困境銀行直接注資。對投資者來說,這不是一個利好訊息。

If only one didn’t have to get from here to there. As so often with EU proposals, banking supervision plans – which would make the European Central Bank the ultimate prudential supervisor for about 6,000 eurozone banks – have a high-level logic. Bank sector risk would be managed with less scope for domestic political indulgence. The nexus between sovereign debt issuance and local bank support, a large factor in the eurozone crisis, should be lessened. Pan-European schemes for dealing with failing banks and protecting depositors could become simpler to enforce. All of which would make the banking landscape less scary.

如果不用經過這個艱難的過程就好了。就像很多歐盟提案一樣,其銀行監管計劃(這將使歐洲央行成爲歐元區6000家銀行的最終監管者)具有高層次的邏輯。銀行業風險得到集中管理,不讓國內政治有太大的插手空間。主權債務發行和當地銀行支持(這是釀成歐元區危機的一大因素)之間的糾結應該減輕。處理陷入困境的銀行和保障儲戶的泛歐計劃可以更簡單地執行。這一切都會使歐洲銀行業版圖變得不那麼可怕。

您已閱讀33%(810字),剩餘67%(1649字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×