If the markets were truly Darwinian, would growth investors exist? They pay up for stocks with strong prospects. That is, they shell out for something that might materialise, in contrast to value investors, who pay less for assets that exist now. Looked at this way, there is a reason that growth investing does not have a hero such as Warren Buffett. It’s stupid.
如果市場確實按照達爾文理論演化，那成長型投資者還會存在嗎？他們願意出高價買下前景強勁的股票。也就是說，他們會出高價買進可能成爲現實的東西，這與價值型投資者相反，後者以折扣價購買現實存在的資產。如此看來，成長型投資者中出不了像華倫•巴菲特(Warren Buffett)這樣的英雄是有原因的。這種方法很愚蠢。
您已閱讀20%（517字），剩餘80%（2014字）包含更多重要資訊，訂閱以繼續探索完整內容，並享受更多專屬服務。