智慧財產

Lex_Online piracy

The online piracy debate supplies central casting villains for all sides. On the one hand, Rupert Murdoch. When the Obama administration objected to granting the authorities power to make offending websites disappear (“domain name system blocking”), Murdoch tweeted this grotesque exaggeration: “Obama has thrown in his lot with Silicon Valley paymasters.” Then you have the operators of The Pirate Bay file-sharing website. They offer the childish brag that because they don’t actually store stolen content, it is “not possible to hold the people behind The Pirate Bay responsible” for stealing. Someone, please lock these people in a room together.

There is agreement on one point. Content producers need to make it easier for consumers to be legitimate customers. How well this will work depends on the type of content.

A solution is already at hand for older, or “tail”, video content: Netflix makes money and writes big cheques to movie and TV studios. The revenues of the music industry have shrunk by half during the past decade, but a recent resurgence in sales volumes shows that services such as iTunes and Spotify are helping. Software is a harder case. Apple makes its software harder to steal by bundling it up with fancy hardware, but even it has to spend loads of time and money suing suspected infringers. High-cost, high-end content, like first-run movies and live sporting events, may be the hardest case of all.

您已閱讀78%(1428字),剩餘22%(407字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×