觀點在港經商

Opinion: Territory’s glittering attractions clouded by health hazard

Imagine you are hosting a party. You have space to accommodate 100 people. Fire and safety regulations won’t allow any more, but you have invited a lot of people. Thus, some must leave before you can allow more in.

This is the situation with Hong Kong’s desire to build a third airport runway. There are interesting parallels with the plans to add a third runway at Heathrow. In both cases proponents have emphasised economic benefits, while non-governmental organisations have called for a more holistic assessment that includes social and environmental impacts.

For an eye-watering HK$136.2bn, the region could handle more passenger and cargo capacity, and hold on to its pre-eminent position as a hub. Its economy is expected to benefit by HK$900bn.

您已閱讀18%(750字),剩餘82%(3379字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×