專欄印度

Tackling subsidies can help India spend better

India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, or NREGA, seemed unpromising from its inception. Not only did it have an ugly acronym that sounded like a Panamanian dictator in search of two vowels. It also threatened to become yet another wasteful subsidy, destined to distort prices, to be filched by corrupt middlemen and to tear a new hole in India's threadbare finances.

NREGA, enacted in 2005, has turned out to be a roaring success. Essentially a Rooseveltian make-work scheme that guarantees 100 days of manual work a year, it was probably the biggest factor in last year's emphatic electoral victory by the Congress party-led alliance. Worth just $170 per family – rightly deemed “crumbs from the high table” by Arundhati Roy, the novelist and campaigner – its popularity is an indication of the desperate circumstances in which hundreds of millions of Indians still live.

As well as alleviating abject poverty, the scheme is credited with helping to put a floor under domestic consumption. India grew at 6.7 per cent even as the global financial crisis raged around it. In the coming financial year, the economy is projected to expand by 8.8 per cent.

您已閱讀22%(1160字),剩餘78%(4187字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

戴維•皮林

戴維•皮林(David Pilling)現爲《金融時報》非洲事務主編。先前他是FT亞洲版主編。他的專欄涉及到商業、投資、政治和經濟方面的話題。皮林1990年加入FT。他曾經在倫敦、智利、阿根廷工作過。在成爲亞洲版主編之前,他擔任FT東京分社社長。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×