專欄印度大選

India votes for pragmatism- if anything

In

Amit Mitra, a prominent Indian business leader, put it best. “We were very worried that we were going to get a kedgeree,” he said, expressing widespread concern that India's election would produce an inchoate mishmash of politicians and ideologies. Instead, the country's regionally and caste-divided electorate has somehow combined to cook up an altogether better-planned menu – a Congress-led thali.

Having spent the past five weeks telling us that the result would be determined by local or factional issues, commentators are scrambling to impose a national narrative on the individual votes of 420m Indians. The electorate, we are now told, has collectively opted for modernism, stability, growth and governance. Thank goodness that votes for backwardness, instability, stagnation and corruption were unsuccessful.

您已閱讀16%(819字),剩餘84%(4445字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

戴維•皮林

戴維•皮林(David Pilling)現爲《金融時報》非洲事務主編。先前他是FT亞洲版主編。他的專欄涉及到商業、投資、政治和經濟方面的話題。皮林1990年加入FT。他曾經在倫敦、智利、阿根廷工作過。在成爲亞洲版主編之前,他擔任FT東京分社社長。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×