Sting in the tale told by history's big swindlers

This was, after all, a hedge fund that delivered implausibly consistent, and consistently good, returns. These were verified by a firm of auditors employing all of three people. Mr Madoff dealt through his own in-house broker, raising questions about custody of assets and internal control. Many experts felt the options trading strategy he claimed to pursue could not have generated such returns with so many billions under management. Why were professional as well as private investors taken in?

The economic historian Charles Kindleberger believed that “swindling is demand-determined, following Keynes's law that demand determines its own supply, rather than Say's law that supply creates its own demand. In a boom, fortunes are made, individuals wax greedy, and swindlers come forward to exploit that greed”.

In practice, the requisite bait for the greedy is a good story. These used to be colourful – so much so in the 1820s stock market boom in London that they were parodied in a joke prospectus asking for money “to drain the Red Sea, in search of the gold and jewels left by the Egyptians, in their passage after the Israelites”.

您已閱讀22%(1137字),剩餘78%(3952字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×