FT商學院

The real history of free speech — from supreme ideal to poisonous politics

The 300-year-old doctrine is being tested by the excesses of digital oligarchs, says historian Fara Dabhoiwala

A few weeks ago, as his administration embarked on a purge of the US government that evoked the mass firings and inquisitions of the 1950s, the American vice-president, JD Vance, took time out to explain to Europeans that, in fact, they were the ones who had a problem with ideological diversity. “In Britain and across Europe,” he scolded them, “free speech, I fear, is in retreat.” 

The message was clear: no government should engage in “digital censorship”, police “hateful” communications or prohibit “so-called misinformation”. His friend, the world’s richest person Elon Musk, a self-described “free-speech absolutist”, now commands the world’s largest personal megaphone, whose algorithm appears to amplify his own speech over that of others. Jeff Bezos, another billionaire media baron, has banned the Washington Post from publishing any opinion pieces that contradict his own celebration of “personal liberties and free markets”.

Behind them all looms the current president, who recently declared that he had “stopped all government censorship and brought back free speech in America”. Meanwhile, his administration is attacking universities and scholarship, bullying news organisations and gutting the federal workforce, in order to suppress voices and ideas it dislikes — criticism of Israel, references to the climate crisis, support for trans rights, saying “the Gulf of Mexico” rather than “the Gulf of America”. 

您已閱讀8%(1425字),剩餘92%(15415字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×