FT商學院

Israel has no good options in Gaza
以色列在加沙進退兩難

In Hamas, it faces an adversary that lacks a realistic strategy. But military force cannot succeed without a plan for what comes next, writes historian Lawrence Freedman
以色列面對的哈馬斯是一個缺乏現實戰略的對手。但是,如果不爲下一步制定計劃,軍事力量就不可能取得成功。

At times of war the art of strategy is to align military means with political ends. However competent the armed forces and brilliant their tactics, if they cannot reach the desired objective then something has to give: the objective must be made more realistic or more means must be found. If neither is possible the result will be frustration, disillusion or even worse. 

在戰爭時期,戰略的藝術是使軍事手段與政治目的一致。無論武裝部隊多麼能幹,戰術多麼高明,如果他們不能達到預期的目標,那麼就必須做出一些讓步:必須使目標更加現實,或者必須找到更多的手段。如果兩者都不可能,結果將是沮喪、幻滅,甚至更糟。

您已閱讀2%(487字),剩餘98%(20059字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×