FT商學院

‘Open science’ advocates warn of widespread academic fraud

Scandals at Stanford and Harvard show manipulation of research remains an issue despite growth of ‘data detectives’

A decade since Brian Nosek launched an initiative to tackle academic fraud, efforts to impose greater accountability in research have in the past few weeks claimed two of their most high-profile scalps.

Marc Tessier-Lavigne, a distinguished neuroscientist and president of Stanford, resigned and pledged to retract a series of papers in prestigious journals after an independent inquiry concluded they used manipulated data. Harvard has similarly demanded retractions of papers co-written by professor Francesca Gino, a leading dishonesty expert in its business school who is currently on administrative leave.

“There is a culture of greater transparency,” said Nosek, a professor at the University of Virginia and co-founder of the Center for Open Science. “The observation of fraud is certainly increasing, but we don’t know the denominator.”

您已閱讀15%(842字),剩餘85%(4668字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×