觀點新型冠狀病毒

UK’s confused claim to ‘follow the science’ eroded public trust

At first sight, it seems strange that the classroom has become a battleground for Covid-19 policy in the UK.

Schools offer safe spaces for children, providing education, protection and childcare while parents work. Fortunately, aside from rare cases where coronavirus seems to trigger a serious but treatable condition known as Kawasaki disease, children are generally spared the worst symptoms. That is why the UK government wants a phased reopening of schools in England from June 1.

Yet the plan has met resistance from some teachers and parents. The reason is neither obstinacy nor cowardice; it simply reflects a loss of confidence in how politicians and scientists have handled the pandemic. There is confusion and suspicion about how scientific advice feeds into policy; how those policies are presented to the public; and who is accountable for them. Early decisions touted as science-led, such as scaling back testing and contact tracing in mid-March, turned out to be wrong and contrary to World Health Organization advice. Testing was key to Germany and South Korea keeping death rates low and partially lifting their lockdowns.

您已閱讀29%(1137字),剩餘71%(2804字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×