專欄英美

Why Trump’s US is worse off than Brexit Britain

Viewed medium term, which country is most damaged — Brexit Britain or Donald Trump’s US? Many people would currently name Britain. They expect the House of Commons to vote down the UK’s withdrawal agreement with the EU this autumn, triggering a chaotic “ no-deal Brexit”. That could cause shortfalls of food and medicine, and disrupt travel and trade. Conversely, the betting must be that Trump — whose disapproval rating is at a record 60 per cent — loses office in 2020.

Yet I suspect the UK’s prospects are better. The country’s chances of a deal with Brussels are much higher than commonly thought. Though even a smooth Brexit is a pointless act of self-harm, Britain will probably achieve it with only modest damage by 2020. By then, meanwhile, the US could easily have become ungovernable.

Forecasts of a no-deal Brexit rest on a false assumption: that the withdrawal agreement will include some version of Theresa May’s Chequers proposal to the EU. Broadly, Chequers would keep the UK in Europe’s single market for goods but not for services. Many Tory MPs crave a harder Brexit. If the withdrawal agreement contains Chequers, they would probably join Labour in voting it down, risking no deal.

您已閱讀23%(1199字),剩餘77%(4013字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

西蒙•庫柏

西蒙•庫柏(Simon Kuper)1994年加入英國《金融時報》,在1998年離開FT之前,他撰寫一個每日更新的貨幣專欄。2002年,他作爲體育專欄作家重新加入FT,一直至今。如今,他爲FT週末版雜誌撰寫一個話題廣泛的專欄。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×