觀點經濟發展新動力

In the service sector, time is a better measure of productivity

At a conference recently, I heard the chief executive of a supermarket chain proudly claim that installing automatic checkout machines was improving the company’s productivity. This is wrong, of course. These machines have replaced traditional checkout equipment — and their paid human operators — with unpaid customer labour in scanning and bagging. The company’s measured revenue per employee hour will certainly be rising. True productivity will not. Economic welfare in the round is reduced by the struggle we customers have with the still-imperfect new machines.

This raises the question of what would count as a genuine productivity gain. The retail sector made massive strides in productivity during the 1990s, mainly thanks to the use of the new information and communication technologies in logistics. Perhaps automation has further to go in terms of delivering products to the supermarkets. But what would higher productivity look like in terms of actually getting groceries into customers’ shopping bags?

The answer might well lie with Amazon’s experimental store, Amazon Go. Customers put what they want in their bags and walk through a turnstile. A proliferation of cameras — and an algorithm — watch them, add up their bills and charge it to them. There is no checkout process at all.

您已閱讀33%(1296字),剩餘67%(2581字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×