專欄美聯準

Beware the high costs and psychology of America’s QE3

Earlier this month, America’s Duke University asked the chief financial officers of 887 large companies how they might respond to falling interest rates. The results were noteworthy for economists, political pundits and investors alike.

Some 91 per cent of groups said a 1 per cent fall in interest rates would have no impact on their business plans, while 84 per cent professed indifference towards even a 2 per cent fall. “CFOs believe that a monetary action would not be particularly effective,” the survey concluded; or not, that is, in terms of boosting investment and jobs.

This is sobering stuff. When Ben Bernanke, Fed chairman, unveiled his “QE3” measures last week – a promise to buy more mortgage-backed securities as part of quantitative easing – he justified this by pointing to the continued high levels of unemployment and weak growth. By providing an open-ended commitment to buy securities, the Fed hopes to bolster demand and thus create more jobs.

您已閱讀21%(964字),剩餘79%(3721字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

吉蓮•邰蒂

吉蓮•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)擔任英國《金融時報》的助理主編,負責全球金融市場的報導。2009年3月,她榮獲英國出版業年度記者。她1993年加入FT,曾經被派往前蘇聯和歐洲地區工作。1997年,她擔任FT東京分社社長。2003年,她回到倫敦,成爲Lex專欄的副主編。邰蒂在劍橋大學獲得社會人文學博士學位。她會講法語、俄語、日語和波斯語。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×