IMF

IMF looks at pros and cons of ‘bail-in’ regimes for banks

“Bail-in” regimes, where creditors are forced to take losses when banks are rescued, would help make giant institutions safer, but they could also spread contagion in a financial crisis, a paper by International Monetary Fund staff members has warned.

To prevent the collapse of one bank from destabilising the broader financial system, the IMF staff note argues that regulators may want to limit the amount of unsecured bank debt other financial institutions can hold. That would effectively limit their losses if a failing bank’s debt is “bailed in” – converted to equity or partly written down as part of a broader stabilisation effort.

The IMF staff issued their comprehensive look at bail-in regimes at a time when global regulators are working on proposals to make giant “systemically important financial institutions” (Sifis) safer and reduce the risk of additional taxpayer-funded bank rescues.

您已閱讀31%(900字),剩餘69%(2035字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×