觀點利比亞

Why Libya sceptics were proved badly wrong
西方不能不管利比亞


前美國國務院政策規劃司司長斯勞特:將美國描繪爲「幕後領導」沒有任何意義。在當今這個多級世界,許多問題都極其宏大,任何一個國家都無法獨立解決。

Let us do a thought experiment. Imagine the UN did not vote to authorise the use of force in Libya in March. Nato did nothing; Colonel Muammer Gaddafi over-ran Benghazi; the US stood by; the Libyan opposition was reduced to sporadic uprisings, quickly crushed. The regimes in Yemen and Syria took note, and put down their own uprisings with greater vigour. The west let brutality and oppression triumph again in the Middle East.

讓我們做一個思想實驗吧。假設今年3月聯合國(UN)沒有投票批准對利比亞動用武力。北約(Nato)什麼都沒做;穆安瑪爾•格達費(Muammar Gaddafi)攻佔了班加西;美國袖手旁觀;利比亞反對派被壓制得只剩下零星的反抗,很快被消滅。目睹了這一切的葉門和敘利亞政權,加大力度鎮壓了本國的叛亂。西方聽任野蠻和壓迫再次在中東獲勝。

您已閱讀9%(592字),剩餘91%(5888字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×