資源暴利稅

RESOURCE TAX

That high-pitched whining noise is coming from Canberra, where miners are calling on the Australian government to reverse its proposed super tax on resource profits. The campaign is urging that the new rate be applied to new projects only, and to reduce that rate from 40 per cent.

On both, the miners have a decent case. The proposed tax applies to all operating earnings on Australian projects, deductible against company tax with concessions on capex, exploration and development. That would have an outsized impact on companies harvesting cash from a heavily depreciated asset base, such as Rio Tinto or BHP Billiton, with decades of investment in the Pilbara. Lifting the effective taxation rate from about 40 per cent to 55, meanwhile, would give Australia one of the world's harshest fiscal regimes, 14 per cent above average.

Basic game theory, however, suggests the industry will win one concession but not both. The Australian government will have been encouraged by appreciative noises from Chile and Brazil; Congo, Zambia and Mongolia are also likely to follow suit, says UBS.

您已閱讀62%(1086字),剩餘38%(671字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×