高盛

Goldman Sachs
Lex專欄:美國證交會起訴高盛的後果


美國證交會針對高盛的訴狀證實了人們對華爾街投行的指控:正是他們的「產品」引發了金融危機。問題在於,這應當歸因於蓄意欺騙、無能,還是黴運?若屬於蓄意欺騙,此案影響如何?

At last we have come to the point. The behaviour outlined in the US Securities and Exchange Commission's devastating complaint against Goldman Sachs neatly encapsulates the most important and damning of the charges that have circulated in the past two years against investment banks in general and Goldman in particular. Sales of structured products backed by subprime securities triggered the credit crisis. The question is whether this was down to deliberate deception, incompetence or bad luck. Now the SEC will attempt to make a charge of deliberate deception stick.

終於有人說到了點子上。美國證交會(SEC)針對高盛(Goldman Sachs)的具有摧毀力的訴狀所概述的行爲,精闢概括了過去兩年來坊間流傳的針對投行(尤其是高盛)的最重要、最切中要害的指控。銷售由次貸證券支持的結構化產品,引發了信貸危機。問題在於,這應當歸因於蓄意欺騙、無能還是黴運?現在,美國證交會將設法證明,有關蓄意欺騙的指控是站得住腳的。

您已閱讀31%(743字),剩餘69%(1663字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×