普丁

How Putin aged into a classic oil state autocrat

From an economic perspective, the Russian leader is a universal type
The writer is chair of Rockefeller International

On a visit to New York in 2003, Vladimir Putin pitched himself to investors as an economic reformer willing to engage western capitalists, telling us that Russia was more than just another petrostate and shared the values of a “normal European nation”.  

Those words ring hollow now that Putin is invading Ukraine, but he seemed sincere at the time. Having taken over a nation battered in the late 1990s by financial crisis and default, he was pushing privatisation and deregulation. He instituted a flat 13 per cent income tax, winning over US conservatives. With a boost from oil prices, reforms helped to increase Russian per capita income from $2,000 at the start of his tenure in 2000 to a peak of $16,000 by the early 2010s.

But power and success changed Putin. Unlike his peers in other emerging markets, he soon stopped meeting foreign fund managers. One of his aides told me such meetings were for “middling and small powers”, not great ones like the US and Russia.

您已閱讀22%(1020字),剩餘78%(3691字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×