Web3與加密金融

Stablecoins reconsidered

Plus solar stocks vs Trump

Good morning. The S&P 500 rallied yesterday, as investors rejoiced over Donald Trump backing down, for now, from higher tariffs on the EU (Taco!). The index rose 2 per cent, led by consumer discretionary and info tech; defensives such as utilities and real estate were also up, but by less. Email us: [email protected].

People think I’m wrong about stablecoins

Yesterday, after I wrote that stablecoin issuers are banks and that stablecoins are bank deposits, an above average number of people said I was stupid on the internet (not the highest recorded number; that level is reserved for when I write about gold or Warren Buffett).

The most common argument against me was that what I described, in laying out what a stablecoin issuer does, is not a bank but a money-market fund. Like a stablecoin issuer, a money-market fund takes cash from investors, puts that cash to work in shortish-term assets, and issues the investors a liability that it promises to redeem on demand and at par. The crucial difference is that banks — by virtue of the fact that they can hold fractional reserves — create money when they make loans. For many people, that is the defining feature of a bank, and stablecoin issuers (at least under the Genius act) don’t do it.

您已閱讀15%(1243字),剩餘85%(7030字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
虛擬貨幣相關活動存在較大法律風險。請根據監管規範,注意甄別和遠離非法金融活動,謹防個人財產和權益受損。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×