FT商學院

The problem with the Trump trade

Speculative hedge funds are placing bets but other investors have been more cautious

For some heavy hitters (and big egos) in markets, the worst possible outcome from the US presidential election is a victory for Kamala Harris.

A narrowing or even vanishing lead in the opinion polls for the Democratic candidate, mixed in with a big rise in wagers on her rival in the betting markets, have been enough to convince a good chunk of macro hedge fund managers that Donald Trump is on his way back to the White House. Some wishful thinking by speculative investors (who skew white, male and wealthy) could also be at play.

Political wonks still often say the election is a coin toss, and that the political betting markets are unrepresentative and best ignored. BlackRock chief Larry Fink this week argued that the result of the election “really doesn’t matter” for markets — a relaxed stance that it’s fair to say is not universal. In any case, once unleashed, a political frenzy — among certain types of investors at least — is hard to suppress.

您已閱讀19%(956字),剩餘81%(4167字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×