觀點Web3與加密金融

I read Andreessen’s ‘techno-optimist manifesto’ so you don’t have to

Unrestrained technological ‘accelerationism’ is a bad idea

It would be reasonable upon reading Marc Andreessen’s “techno-optimist manifesto”, to feel somewhat perplexed, and then to wonder: is the billionaire bitcoin-backing venture capitalist OK? After all, the 5,000-odd-word essay, published on his VC fund a16z’s website on Monday, does contain such phrases as: “Love doesn’t scale . . . Let’s stick with money”; “We believe in the romance of technology . . . the eros of the train, the car, the electric light”; and, perhaps most startlingly: “We believe any deceleration of AI will cost lives. Deaths that were preventable by the AI that was prevented from existing is a form of murder.” 

Yet many Silicon Valley types who have read Andreessen’s screed — the central argument of which is that “there is no material problem . . . that cannot be solved with more technology” — seem not only to see nothing even mildly unusual about it, but to believe that it is actually a work of genius. 

“This is the path towards progress,” Brian Armstrong, founder of crypto exchange Coinbase, enthused on X. “Decel narratives are all around us in popular culture and in meetings among elites. Thank you @a16z for a breath of fresh air,” he added. The fact that a16z is an investor in his company presumably makes the air extra fresh.

您已閱讀27%(1264字),剩餘73%(3474字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
虛擬貨幣相關活動存在較大法律風險。請根據監管規範,注意甄別和遠離非法金融活動,謹防個人財產和權益受損。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×