觀點英國軍事

Britain’s armed forces must adapt radically to meet future threats

War in Europe should focus minds on the need for a more agile and potent fighting force

The writer is a former US naval officer and senior adviser at the Atlantic Council think-tank Is Britain a formidable military power today? Sadly, no. Even though the UK would only enter a conflict with partners, its conventional forces are now critically underpowered. Indeed, the total number of active duty personnel — about 150,000 — is smaller than the US Marine Corps.

Last month’s UK Defence Command Paper, which sets out a strategy for meeting current and future threats, does not help. It offers no viable vision or strategic plan to reverse this condition. The paper relies heavily on repeating concepts from the US National Defense Strategy rather than setting a course demanded by today’s realities. More radical thinking is needed.

Ben Wallace, Britain’s outgoing defence secretary, has promised the country will spend at least £100bn a year on its military by 2030; about double what it spends today. But given inflation, the purchasing power of this sum will have withered in seven years’ time.

您已閱讀27%(1007字),剩餘73%(2761字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×