專欄美聯準

Do not underestimate Jay Powell in a fight with Donald Trump

Economists from Duke University and London Business School recently published research into a once-unthinkable — but now timely — question: how much market impact does a presidential Twitter attack on the US Federal Reserve actually have?

The answer offers reasons for hope — and fear. On the upbeat side, the tangible market impact of Donald Trump’s demands for looser monetary policy have been modest so far, the research suggests; the implied yield on Fed Funds futures contracts apparently declined by an average of 0.30 basis points after each attack, producing “the cumulative effect of around negative 10 bps” so far. This is so small in the wider scheme of things that it would undoubtedly disappoint Mr Trump in the (unlikely) event he read this research.

What is less cheering is that the fact futures prices moved at all after Mr Trump’s tweets suggests that “markets do not perceive the Federal Reserve Bank as a fully independent institution immune from political pressure”, the economists argue. There is, in other words, already some implied damage.

您已閱讀23%(1062字),剩餘77%(3542字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。

吉蓮•邰蒂

吉蓮•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)擔任英國《金融時報》的助理主編,負責全球金融市場的報導。2009年3月,她榮獲英國出版業年度記者。她1993年加入FT,曾經被派往前蘇聯和歐洲地區工作。1997年,她擔任FT東京分社社長。2003年,她回到倫敦,成爲Lex專欄的副主編。邰蒂在劍橋大學獲得社會人文學博士學位。她會講法語、俄語、日語和波斯語。

相關文章

相關話題

設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×