觀點人工智慧

IBM’s debating computer suggests human brains are nothing special

Like many informed people I talk to, I believe artificial intelligence is often overblown. Plenty of experts agree that what Arthur C Clarke called the “artificial stupidity” of computers makes them our servants, not our masters.

Surely the human brain’s ability to think creatively, to have intuition, ideas and even hunches is impossible to replicate electronically?

But what if AI sceptics have over-estimated the human brain? Last week, IBM demonstrated a programme that just about held its own against a skilled human debater on the topics of whether government support of space exploration and telemedicine were good things. It was not wholly convincing, but it did make me rethink AI.

您已閱讀14%(689字),剩餘86%(4111字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×