FT商學院

A regulatory shake-up that would give central banks too much power

Proposal on capital rules could mean investors end up outsourcing their investment decision to the regulator
The writer is afounding partner of Veritum Partners

The life of an analyst of bank stocks is not for everyone. Much of the day is spent wading through regulatory minutiae, maintaining bloated spreadsheets and hacking through a thicket of acronyms such as CCBs, CCyBs, G-SIB, ATI, Pillar 2 etc.

A recent speech by a senior UK regulator has proposed making things simpler, perhaps too simple though. Sam Woods, deputy governor for prudential regulation at the Bank of England and chief executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, laid out a vision of a new system of regulation for bank capital.

On the face of it, this sounds like an excellent idea, but it could actually have worrisome repercussions, further extending the arguably outsized power of central banks in markets.

您已閱讀17%(778字),剩餘83%(3710字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×