登錄
註冊
我的賬戶
登出
搜尋
關閉
搜尋
FT中文網
Menu
首頁
首頁
FT中文網首頁
特別報導
「新四大發明」背後的中國浪潮
與FT共進午餐
西門子·智慧城市羣
未來生活 未來金融
高階訂閱
標準訂閱
熱門文章
一週
一月
季度
一年
會議活動
市場活動
FT商學院
FT電子書
職業機會
FT商城
日經中文網精選
中國
中國
頻道首頁
政經
商業
金融市場
股市
房地產
社會與文化
觀點
全球
全球
頻道首頁
美國
英國
亞太
歐洲
美洲
非洲
經濟
經濟
頻道首頁
全球經濟
中國經濟
貿易
環境
經濟評論
金融市場
金融市場
頻道首頁
股市
外匯
債市
大宗商品
金融市場數據
商業
商業
頻道首頁
金融
科技
汽車
地產
農林
能源
工業和採礦
航空和運輸
醫藥
娛樂
零售和消費品
傳媒和文化
創新經濟
創新經濟
頻道首頁
人工智慧
大數據
網路
新能源與新交通
其他
區塊鏈與數位幣
教育
教育
頻道首頁
學前教育
中小學與國際學校
高等教育與海外留學
商業與職場教育
教育改革與創新
觀點
觀點
頻道首頁
Lex專欄
專欄
分析
評論
社評
書評
讀者有話說
管理
管理
頻道首頁
FT商學院
職場
領導力
財富管理
人物
生活時尚
生活時尚
頻道首頁
樂尚街
美食與美酒
藝術及文化活動
品味
旅行
生活話題
藝術與娛樂
消費經
影片
影片
頻道首頁
政經
產經
金融
文化
FT看見
音訊
音訊
頻道首頁
麥可林學英語
BoomEar藝術播客
一波好書
音樂之生
i聽粉
每日英語
每日英語
頻道首頁
雙語閱讀
FT英語速讀
原聲影片
FT英語電臺
音樂之生
麥可林學英語
每日一詞
換腦ReWired
換腦ReWired
頻道首頁
登錄
註冊
我的賬戶
會員訂閱
兌換中心
郵件訂閱
我的關注
我的評論
我的收藏
我的銀行卡
登出
關注我們
WeChat公衆號
新浪微網誌
X
Facebook
LinkedIn
工具
移動應用大全
會員訂閱
兌換中心
郵件訂閱
我的關注
我的評論
我的收藏
我的銀行卡
RSS
What retailers are telling us
零售商帶給我們的啓示
And long bonds gone wild
儘管經濟存在不確定性,美國消費者支出仍保持穩健,但關稅政策對零售價格的潛在影響尚未完全顯現。
收藏
更新於2025年5月24日 08:40
Robert Armstrong
,
Aiden Reiter
,
Hakyung Kim
Play
Pause
00:00
{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"<div class=\"pic\"><picture><img src=\"https://dq4atoxl7csa1.cloudfront.net/unsafe/1920x0/https://d1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net/production/eec56631-25f4-44a0-827e-8fd9d7560060.jpg\"></picture></div>"}],[{"start":8.75,"text":"Good morning. The House of Representatives narrowly passed Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” yesterday, leaving the Senate as the final hurdle. As it stands, the bill will add to the already large US fiscal deficit. The bond market moved little on the news. Perhaps fiscal profligacy was priced in. Email us: unhedged@ft.com"}],[{"start":34.739999999999995,"text":"Retail results"}],[{"start":36.669999999999995,"text":"How is the US consumer holding up? And what will be the effect of higher tariffs on consumer prices?"}],[{"start":43.459999999999994,"text":"These are two of the biggest questions facing US markets, and they are interrelated. Happily, over the past week or so, we have received some insights into both. A series of important US retailers have reported results, including “big box” players Walmart, Target, BJ Wholesale, Home Depot, and Lowe’s; as well as specialists TJX, Ross Stores, Urban Outfitters, Ralph Lauren and Williams Sonoma."}],[{"start":74,"text":"On the health of the consumer, there has been an apparent contradiction between two sets of indicators. “Soft” data from sentiment surveys and the like looks terrible, but “hard” data on employment and consumer spending have been solid. The retailers’ results, quite clearly, refute the bad soft data and confirm the good hard data. The only chains posting negative same-store sales growth were Lowe’s (which is struggling with a frozen housing market) and Target (whose business model and strategy has been wobbling for years)."}],[{"start":null,"text":"<div class=\"pic\"><picture><source media=\"screen and (max-width: 490px)\" srcset=\"https://dq4atoxl7csa1.cloudfront.net/unsafe/980x0/https://d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net/prod/835f2e10-375b-11f0-adc8-87246425116f-mobile.png\"><img src=\"https://dq4atoxl7csa1.cloudfront.net/unsafe/1920x0/https://d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net/prod/835f2e10-375b-11f0-adc8-87246425116f-standard.png\"></picture></div>"}],[{"start":110.83,"text":"While the companies say — as they have for several quarters — that customers are “focused on value”, and at times hesitant about big-ticket purchases, it’s hard to find any signs of a recent slowdown in the retailers’ results. The head of Walmart’s US business said that consumers “remain . . . consistent. And we continue to see customers prioritising value and speed of delivery. We have seen growth across all income cohorts in the quarter.”"}],[{"start":141.52,"text":"And while every company nodded to higher uncertainty, almost all of them kept their annual sales and profit targets in place. The notable exception was Ross Stores, a discount clothing chain which sources more than half of its products from China. It withdrew its previous targets because of the “varying nature of tariff announcements”. "}],[{"start":166.47,"text":"Which brings us to the question of prices, where the picture is less clear. Part of this has to do with the sequencing of the reports. Walmart reported on May 15th, and said, with admirable plainness, that “given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren’t able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins”. One analyst asked why Walmart didn’t see the tariffs as an opportunity to cut prices and take market share from weaker rivals. Chief executive Doug McMillon replied that the company would"}],[{"start":null,"text":"<blockquote class=\"n-content-blockquote\"><p>. . . watch what customers are telling us and the response that we get from them and the pressure that they’re feeling. So the bottom line is, if we need to invest more [in low prices], we can. Having said that, I really want to grow profit faster than sales. Like we’ve been working on this for a long time. I think we deserve that. You guys [investors] deserve that. And we can navigate this in a way as we balance all the interest between customers, shareholders and everyone else such that we can keep prices low enough to help people and grow profit faster than sales.</p></blockquote>"}],[{"start":208.16,"text":"To Unhedged, that’s a nice statement of how corporate capitalism is meant to work, but the US president disagrees. Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social that Walmart and their Chinese suppliers should “EAT THE TARIFFS”."}],[{"start":224.49,"text":"Retailers who reported after Walmart seem to have taken notice of the president’s displeasure, and described their price strategies in circumspect or vague terms, often with reference to “portfolio pricing” (prices seen as a whole, with increases netted against decreases). A Home Depot executive hedged the issue like this:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"<blockquote class=\"n-content-blockquote\"><p>We intend to generally maintain pricing across our portfolio . . . we don’t see broad-based price increases for our customers at all going forward . . . It’s a great opportunity for us to take share, and it’s a great opportunity for our suppliers to take share as well.</p></blockquote>"}],[{"start":248.34,"text":"“Generally”; “Broad-based”; interpret these qualifiers however you like. Several other companies said they were committed to remaining price competitive. Most said they had “many levers” to pull to offset tariffs, of which price was only one. And so on. "}],[{"start":265.48,"text":"Reading between the lines, the industry line on price increases is: some prices are certainly going up because of tariffs; we’ll see how customers respond; and we’ll take it from there."}],[{"start":278.41,"text":"Long bond yields"}],[{"start":280.6,"text":"The long end is rising. And not just in the US: 30-year bond yields are rising across developed economies:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"<div class=\"pic\"><picture><source media=\"screen and (max-width: 490px)\" srcset=\"https://dq4atoxl7csa1.cloudfront.net/unsafe/980x0/https://d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net/prod/b4714120-375e-11f0-b3dd-5fc307762ae0-mobile.png\"><img src=\"https://dq4atoxl7csa1.cloudfront.net/unsafe/1920x0/https://d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net/prod/b4714120-375e-11f0-b3dd-5fc307762ae0-standard.png\"></picture></div>"}],[{"start":289.35,"text":"In recent weeks the US fiscal picture has worsened as the Republican budget has come into focus, and there are concerns about foreign investors rebalancing away from the US. The price of credit default swaps on the country’s debt has risen."}],[{"start":305.94,"text":"While none of that is true in Japan, Germany or the UK, global yields still follow those of the US. “When interest rate volatility goes up in a particular part of the US curve, that term premium moves across other countries very quickly. [Rates are] highly correlated,” says Ed Al-Hussainy of Columbia Threadneedle. Talk all you want about the end of US exceptionalism, US Treasuries are still the basis of the global rate system. If US long bonds are plunging in price, and offering more attractive yields, the rest of the world will feel the gravitational pull."}],[{"start":346.04,"text":"That is, with the possible exception of Japan. There, moves in the long bond may be contributing to the fall in Treasury prices, not just responding to it. Japan has had its own monetary struggles over the past few weeks. James Malcolm at UBS explains:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"<blockquote class=\"n-content-blockquote\"><p>The Japanese situation is specifically Japanese. Primarily, there is a very large amount of Japanese government bonds that need to be issued and refinanced every year. [In the previous monetary regime], the BoJ was an enormous buyer of net new issuance. The market got used to absorbing very little supply . . . [With the end of BoJ’s quantitative easing], now the domestic market has come to the realisation that it has very little capacity to take over from the BoJ.</p></blockquote>"}],[{"start":364.12,"text":"With an ageing population and new defence commitments, the Japanese government still needs to issue a lot of debt, but at the same time the BoJ wants to shrink its balance sheet. Other natural JGB buyers, particularly life insurance companies and pension funds, are facing financial pressures, too. We saw all this at work in a dismal JGB auction earlier this week. "}],[{"start":390.4,"text":"Of course, as we learned during the carry trade panic of last summer, Japan’s rates and currencies are tied to the rest of the world’s. Albert Edwards at Société Générale writes that:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"<blockquote class=\"n-content-blockquote\"><p>Japan’s bond market isn’t isolated. It’s the keystone of global yield suppression. For years, Japanese institutions propped up the global bond market through the yen-funded carry trade and massive foreign bond purchases, especially US Treasuries.</p></blockquote>"}],[{"start":403.38,"text":"The carry trade — borrowing in low-yielding Japanese assets to buy higher yielding global assets — is widely believed to have contributed to higher global asset prices, including Treasury prices. JGB yields rising fast shrinks the rate differential with the rest of the world, making the carry trade less attractive, and pulls US and global yields up."}],[{"start":429.27,"text":"This is all a bit speculative. The size and influence of the carry trade is hard to measure. But we do find the reciprocal nature of global bond moves interesting. The US is contributing to Japan’s bond moves, and Japan might be doing the same to the US. And the pattern looks self-reinforcing."}],[{"start":450.21999999999997,"text":"(Reiter)"}],[{"start":450.84999999999997,"text":"One good read"}],[{"start":452.08,"text":"Arms procurement."}],[{"start":459.04999999999995,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1748047250_6977.mp3"}
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
FT中文網歡迎讀者發表評論,部分評論會被選進《讀者有話說》欄目。我們保留編輯與出版的權利。
匿名
登錄後發表評論
免費註冊
WeChat登錄
排序方式
最新的在上方
最早的在上方
按熱門程度
讀者評論
FT商學院
在馬拉加西森林深處,一座幾乎無人涉足的國家公園「宛如一艘方舟」
美國的「鱷魚惡魔島」式政策爲中國騰出了世界舞臺
一週新聞小測:2025年7月5日
波士頓諮詢公司擬定將巴勒斯坦人從加沙「重新安置」的計劃
蕾切爾•里夫斯:流淚的「鐵娘子」
史蒂夫•班農:「川普將在你腦海中存在很長一段時間」
將引發新一輪金融危機的交易
美國威脅對歐盟食品出口徵收17%的關稅
貿易緊張局勢如何真正影響全球經濟
你真的是人類嗎?
設置字型大小
×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享
×