觀點人工智慧

Grok, o3 and ELMo — there’s a reason AI names are so weird

Incoherent nomenclature is a tradition in the tech sector, where titles are often designed to amuse teams, not users

At the tail-end of January, artificial intelligence start-up OpenAI released its latest model — a cute-sounding version called o3-mini. Designed to repel cheap Chinese rivals, it chalked up another victory for the sector’s mystifying inability to think up coherent names.

See if you can spot the problem: the o3-mini came out six months after the 4o mini. And the 4o mini was released after the 4, which came out after the 3.5. Last week, co-founder Sam Altman confirmed that the next release would be the 4.5.

OpenAI used to employ sensible, sequential numbers, making its AI models as easy to track as iPhone releases. But when the next great leap of technological progress proved difficult to nail down the company’s naming strategy went skittering off in strange new directions. Instead of going from 3 to 4 it began bolting on additional letters and words.

您已閱讀19%(859字),剩餘81%(3592字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×