FT商學院

Trade protectionism masquerading as currency policy is harmful

How about just getting macro policy right and ignore the dollar?
Mark Sobel is US chair of OMFIF and former deputy assistant secretary for International Monetary and Financial Policy at the US Treasury.

Team Trump wants a weaker dollar. But it seems confused on how to get it. Tariffs and expansionary fiscal policy are a recipe for a stronger, not weaker, dollar. 

Nor is both demanding a dollar devaluation and threatening taxes on countries shunning dollars a way to fulfil the Republican promise to protect the dollar’s global dominance. It would jack up US government borrowing costs and undermine the use of the dollar as a lever for financial sanctions. It flies in the face of the old dictum — you can’t devalue your way to prosperity. 

Calls for an “Mar-a-Lago Accord” also seem chimerical. The 1985 Plaza Accord traded US fiscal consolidation for other countries boosting domestic demand, not only actions to weaken the dollar. Today, US fiscal policy is heading in the wrong direction; major central banks are independent and target inflation; and other countries can’t readily boost domestic demand given their own fiscal woes.

您已閱讀13%(1073字),剩餘87%(7197字)包含更多重要資訊,訂閱以繼續探索完整內容,並享受更多專屬服務。
版權聲明:本文版權歸FT中文網所有,未經允許任何單位或個人不得轉載,複製或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵權必究。
設置字型大小×
最小
較小
默認
較大
最大
分享×